Part of HSP Tools

The HSP Pattern Map

HSP · PRACTICE

Common patterns translated into system dynamics, learned logic, function, feedback and possible update directions.

Do you recognize overthinking, procrastination, pleasing, control, avoidance, perfectionism or repeating the same behavior even though you already understand what is happening? The Pattern Map helps explore what may make that pattern logical for your system.

No diagnosis. No new label. A pattern is recognition — not identity.

The question is not: “What is wrong with me?”
The question is: “What system dynamics make this pattern understandable?”

Start with one pattern ↓ Read the explanation first ↓

HSP · PRACTICE

The HSP Pattern Map

Translate one recognizable pattern into a system hypothesis.

Start with what keeps returning, then explore possible input, prediction, learned logic, function, feedback and update direction.

A pattern is recognition, not identity and not a diagnosis.

Marc Sijm · Human System Protocol™

Which pattern do you recognize?

01 · Recognition

Choose one recurring pattern. It does not have to match the list exactly.

Where and when does it appear?

02 · Context

A pattern becomes more precise when you see under which conditions it does and does not appear.

Which prediction may sit underneath it?

03 · Prediction

Not every pattern begins with a conscious thought. You can often still explore what the system seems to expect would happen if you did not use the familiar route.

Which learned logic may fit?

04 · Learned logic

Look for a rule that makes the pattern understandable, not a perfect psychological explanation.

What does the pattern do for the system?

05 · Function

A pattern can be difficult and still be functional in the short term. That is often exactly why it persists.

Which function might the pattern serve?

Which feedback keeps the pattern active?

06 · Feedback & cost

“It works” and “it is good for me” are not the same thing.

Which update direction is small enough?

07 · Direction

An update direction is not yet a method. First describe what the system may need in order to make something else available.

What seems to be needed more?

Use the Pattern Map as a hypothesis. Do not turn “I do this often” into a new identity.

How to use this pattern map

Use

Choose one pattern you recognize. Do not read this to label yourself, but to explore which system area may be active. One pattern can involve several system areas at once.

Use the rules as hypotheses, not as final truth. The best HSP question remains: what fits my specific situation?

Recognition → system area → old rule → possible update direction → suitable support.

Update direction, method and self-help practice

This pattern map distinguishes between three things:

1. Update direction

The update direction describes what the system may need in order to learn something new: slowing down, restoring capacity, testing an old rule or creating new feedback.

2. Coaching method

In coaching, a method can help support that direction. Possible methods include a coaching conversation, The Work, The Journey, PSYCH-K or PMA — Progressive Mental Alignment.

3. Self-help practice

Sometimes a small supporting step is enough to create more visibility, room or safety: journaling, a pause, fact-meaning separation, grounding or a micro-experiment.

HSP remains the map. The complaint does not automatically choose the method. The active system area, available capacity and update-readiness point to the direction.

The suggestions in this map are not a diagnosis and not an instruction. See them as possible routes for carefully exploring what your system may need.

The system areas in plain language

HSP system areaPlain language
InputWhat comes in?
Predictive interpretationWhat does my system make of it?
Operating rules / learned system logicWhich old rule turns on?
ActivationHow strongly is my system switched on?
System pressureWhich pressure narrows my choice?
Resource allocationWhere does my energy go?
CapacityHow much room do I have left?
Output / possible functionWhat is my behavior trying to protect?
FeedbackWhat keeps the pattern alive?
Update-readinessCan my system learn something new?

Overthinking

Overthinking often appears when the system tries to reduce uncertainty through more processing, analysis and prediction.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputEvery signal may matter.
Predictive interpretationIf I understand everything, I will be safer.
Operating rules / learned system logicI must think this through completely before I can act.
ActivationUncertainty feels like risk.
System pressureI need an answer now.
Resource allocationAttention goes to scanning, simulating, replaying and predicting.
CapacityProcessing room gets full.
Output / possible functionThinking replaces acting, asking, resting or deciding.
FeedbackShort relief after thinking teaches the system to think again.
Update-readinessAction feels safe only when there is enough certainty.

Overthinking is often not too much intelligence. It is a system trying to regulate uncertainty.

Possible update direction: Separate fact from meaning; choose one small action without full certainty.

Possible coaching method: The Work or a coaching conversation.

Supporting self-help practice: Journaling, fact-meaning separation or a short uncertainty check.

Procrastination

Procrastination often appears when a task carries more system meaning than the task itself: failure, judgment, loss of control or disappointment.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputTask, deadline or expectation enters as pressure.
Predictive interpretationThis could expose failure, judgment or loss of control.
Operating rules / learned system logicIf I cannot do it well, I should not start.
ActivationTension, freeze or avoidance becomes active.
System pressureI should already have done this.
Resource allocationEnergy goes to avoiding, planning, worrying or distracting.
CapacityStarting energy drops.
Output / possible functionDelay protects against immediate threat.
FeedbackAvoidance gives short relief and reinforces delay.
Update-readinessA smaller, safer start is needed.

Procrastination is often not laziness. It is protection against the meaning attached to the task.

Possible update direction: Make the start smaller than the resistance; begin without needing to prove performance immediately.

Possible coaching method: PMA — Progressive Mental Alignment or a coaching conversation.

Supporting self-help practice: A micro-experiment, five-minute start or safe start structure.

People-pleasing and saying yes while feeling no

People-pleasing often appears when the system chooses approval, connection or tension reduction over free alignment.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputRequest, expectation, disappointment or silence from another person.
Predictive interpretationIf I say no, something will be damaged.
Operating rules / learned system logicI must keep others okay to stay safe.
ActivationTension around rejection, guilt or conflict rises.
System pressureGuilt, urgency or loyalty narrows choice.
Resource allocationEnergy goes to monitoring the other person.
CapacityLittle room remains to feel one’s own boundary.
Output / possible functionSaying yes protects connection or lowers tension.
FeedbackRelief after saying yes reinforces compliance.
Update-readinessSaying no requires small safe experiences where connection can remain.

People-pleasing is often not kindness. It is connection protection under pressure.

Possible update direction: Pause before answering; restore choice space before guilt or approval determines the answer.

Possible coaching method: Coaching conversation, The Work, PSYCH-K or PMA.

Supporting self-help practice: Pause / pressure check, an intermediate answer such as “I’ll get back to you”, or boundary reflection.

Control

Control often appears when the system tries to reduce uncertainty by increasing predictability.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputAmbiguity, open loops, other people’s choices or future scenarios.
Predictive interpretationIf I do not manage this, something may go wrong.
Operating rules / learned system logicI am responsible for preventing bad outcomes.
ActivationAlertness, urgency and tension increase.
System pressureFuture risk feels immediate.
Resource allocationEnergy goes to monitoring, planning and correcting.
CapacityFlexibility drops because control uses resources.
Output / possible functionControl protects against uncertainty or helplessness.
FeedbackRelief after controlling teaches the system to control again.
Update-readinessLetting go needs evidence that uncertainty can be survived.

Control is often not a character flaw. It is a strategy to regulate uncertainty.

Possible update direction: Separate influence from control; choose one clear action within your actual influence.

Possible coaching method: The Work, PMA or a coaching conversation.

Supporting self-help practice: Open-loop closing, circle of influence or journaling about what is and is not within your influence.

Exhaustion

Exhaustion often appears when the system spends more capacity than it can restore.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputToo much demand, noise, responsibility, tasks or social pressure.
Predictive interpretationIf I stop, something will fall apart.
Operating rules / learned system logicI must keep going.
ActivationThe system stays switched on, even during rest.
System pressureProductivity, loyalty or guilt blocks recovery.
Resource allocationEnergy goes to maintenance, survival functioning and monitoring.
CapacityBuffer is low or absent.
Output / possible functionNumbing, scrolling, withdrawal or shutdown protects remaining energy.
FeedbackPushing through keeps life moving short-term but deepens depletion.
Update-readinessRecovery comes before major behavior change.

Exhaustion is often not weakness. It is a capacity signal.

Possible update direction: Capacity before change; first reduce input, open loops and recovery debt.

Possible coaching method: Coaching conversation or PMA.

Supporting self-help practice: Capacity restoration, load reduction, rest structure or recovery planning.

Avoidance and withdrawal

Avoidance often appears when input feels too intense, risky or costly.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputConversation, task, expectation, conflict or possible evaluation.
Predictive interpretationThis may overwhelm me or go wrong.
Operating rules / learned system logicDistance is safer than exposure.
ActivationFreeze, shutdown, heaviness or tension appears.
System pressureHaving to respond creates extra tension.
Resource allocationEnergy goes to escaping or containing.
CapacityLow capacity makes contact or action too expensive.
Output / possible functionAvoidance protects against overload or shame.
FeedbackRelief after withdrawal reinforces withdrawal.
Update-readinessRe-entry needs tiny, low-pressure exposure.

Avoidance is often the system choosing less input, not the person choosing less life.

Possible update direction: Safe re-approach; one small low-pressure step toward what is being avoided.

Possible coaching method: The Journey, PMA or a coaching conversation.

Supporting self-help practice: Safe re-approach, grounding or one micro-step toward the avoided subject.

Triggers and emotional reactivity

Triggers often appear when old predictions come online in response to new input.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputTone, silence, criticism, rejection cue, facial expression or uncertainty.
Predictive interpretationThis means danger, rejection, disrespect or loss.
Operating rules / learned system logicI must defend, explain, please, control or leave.
ActivationActivation rises quickly and automatic output becomes available sooner.
System pressureResponding feels urgent and hard to pause.
Resource allocationEnergy goes to threat detection and response.
CapacityNuance becomes less available.
Output / possible functionDefending, snapping, freezing, pleasing or withdrawing.
FeedbackIf the output lowers tension or threat, the system may learn that route as useful again.
Update-readinessSafe pause and new feedback are needed for a different response.

A trigger is often old prediction meeting new input.

Possible update direction: Trigger slowing; first name what came in, what meaning appeared and how much activation was present.

Possible coaching method: The Journey, The Work or a coaching conversation.

Supporting self-help practice: HSP Trigger Map, grounding, pause or noting body signals.

Guilt around rest, boundaries or saying no

Guilt becomes problematic when the system treats guilt as an instruction instead of a signal.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputRest, no, pause, disappointment or an unmet expectation.
Predictive interpretationThis makes me selfish, unsafe or less valuable.
Operating rules / learned system logicMy value depends on being useful.
ActivationGuilt, tension or urge to explain appears.
System pressureGuilt feels like a command.
Resource allocationEnergy goes to repair, justification or giving in.
CapacityLittle room remains to feel actual need.
Output / possible functionExplaining, saying yes, working or fixing.
FeedbackRelief after compliance reinforces guilt-driven behavior.
Update-readinessThe system needs safe evidence that rest or boundaries do not destroy connection.

Guilt is a signal, not an instruction.

Possible update direction: Treat guilt as a signal, not a command; explore which value or old rule is being touched.

Possible coaching method: The Work, PSYCH-K or a coaching conversation.

Supporting self-help practice: Pause / pressure check, preparing a boundary sentence or journaling about guilt versus responsibility.

Blocking when something matters

Blocking often appears when meaningful action activates risk around visibility, failure, judgment or disappointment.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputImportant task, opportunity, decision, audience or visibility.
Predictive interpretationIf this fails, it means more.
Operating rules / learned system logicIf it matters, I must get it right.
ActivationFreeze, pressure, tension or perfectionism appears.
System pressureImportance becomes urgency.
Resource allocationEnergy goes to outcome monitoring and self-protection.
CapacityCreative or executive space decreases.
Output / possible functionBlocking protects against visible failure.
FeedbackNot acting prevents failure short-term but reinforces threat.
Update-readinessSmaller stakes and safer attempts are needed.

Blocking can mean the step matters enough for the system to treat it as risk.

Possible update direction: Lower the stakes; make the step smaller, more temporary or less visible.

Possible coaching method: PMA, The Work or a coaching conversation.

Supporting self-help practice: Micro-experiment, “good enough for now” step or a safe first version.

Staying up late and scrolling

Staying up late or scrolling can protect autonomy, decompression, avoidance or numbness.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputEnd of day, fatigue, silence, tomorrow, unfinished emotion.
Predictive interpretationIf I stop, I lose the only time that feels mine.
Operating rules / learned system logicI need this before I can let go.
ActivationRestlessness, avoidance or low-grade tension remains active.
System pressureTomorrow starts before sleep begins.
Resource allocationAttention goes to low-effort stimulation.
CapacityCapacity is too low for an intentional transition.
Output / possible functionScrolling protects autonomy, numbs tension or delays tomorrow.
FeedbackShort relief reinforces staying awake.
Update-readinessSleep behavior needs a safer decompression route, not only discipline.

Late-night scrolling may be the system protecting decompression when the day offered too little space.

Possible update direction: Do not replace numbing with discipline, but with decompression; create a safe transition before sleep.

Possible coaching method: PMA or a coaching conversation.

Supporting self-help practice: Short decompression routine, open-loop closing or screen-free transition.

Perfectionism

Perfectionism often appears when imperfection is linked to judgment, rejection, failure or loss of control.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputTask, evaluation, visibility, comparison or uncertainty.
Predictive interpretationIf this is imperfect, I may be judged.
Operating rules / learned system logicGood enough is not safe enough.
ActivationTension around mistakes rises.
System pressureQuality becomes identity protection.
Resource allocationEnergy goes to checking, correcting and delaying.
CapacityMonitoring consumes capacity.
Output / possible functionOverworking, delaying, polishing or hiding.
FeedbackAvoiding criticism reinforces perfectionism.
Update-readinessThe system needs safe experience with “good enough.”

Perfectionism is often not high standards. It is risk management.

Possible update direction: Practice safe good-enough; choose one small output that does not need to be perfect.

Possible coaching method: The Work, PSYCH-K, PMA or a coaching conversation.

Supporting self-help practice: Good-enough practice, time limit or feedback on a small imperfect version.

Conflict avoidance

Conflict avoidance often appears when disagreement is predicted as a risk to connection, safety or belonging.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputDisagreement, tension, tone, silence or possible rejection.
Predictive interpretationConflict means danger or disconnection.
Operating rules / learned system logicKeep peace to stay safe.
ActivationTension, guilt, fear or appeasement appears.
System pressureThe other person’s emotion narrows choice.
Resource allocationEnergy goes to reading mood and preventing escalation.
CapacitySelf-expression becomes less available.
Output / possible functionSilence, agreement, softening or avoiding.
FeedbackPeace after avoidance reinforces avoidance.
Update-readinessSafe disagreement must be practiced in small doses.

Conflict avoidance is often connection protection under threat prediction.

Possible update direction: Practice micro-honesty; express one small difference, preference or boundary without entering the whole conflict.

Possible coaching method: Coaching conversation, The Work or PMA.

Supporting self-help practice: Prepare one small honest sentence, pause or boundary reflection.

Anger and defensiveness

Defensiveness often appears when the system detects attack, pressure, disrespect, unfairness or boundary violation.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputCriticism, interruption, pressure, accusation or dismissal.
Predictive interpretationI am being attacked, controlled or disrespected.
Operating rules / learned system logicI must defend myself now.
ActivationFight energy rises.
System pressureImmediate response feels necessary.
Resource allocationEnergy goes to argument, proof or counterattack.
CapacityListening and nuance decrease.
Output / possible functionDefending, attacking, interrupting or controlling.
FeedbackIf defense stops pressure, the system repeats that route.
Update-readinessPause and repair become available only after activation lowers.

Defensiveness is often protection arriving faster than reflection.

Possible update direction: Lower activation before explaining; then return to what you wanted to protect, set a boundary around or clarify.

Possible coaching method: The Journey or a coaching conversation.

Supporting self-help practice: Grounding, time-out, breathing space or preparing a repair conversation.

Having insight and still repeating the pattern

Sometimes insight is available, but the system has not yet updated under real conditions.

System areaPossible rule or dynamic
InputA familiar situation activates the old route.
Predictive interpretationThis is the same kind of risk as before.
Operating rules / learned system logicUse the known strategy.
ActivationUnder pressure, the old route becomes faster.
System pressureInsight gets overwritten by urgency.
Resource allocationEnergy goes to familiar protection.
CapacityLow capacity reduces access to new behavior.
Output / possible functionOld behavior repeats.
FeedbackRepetition reinforces old reliability.
Update-readinessThe system needs safe repeated feedback, not only understanding.

Insight opens the door. Safe experience updates the system.

Possible update direction: Repeat new feedback under low pressure; do not look for more insight first, but practice one safe experience.

Possible coaching method: PSYCH-K, PMA, The Journey or a coaching conversation.

Supporting self-help practice: Rollback review, micro-experiment or repetition under low pressure.

How this map supports the HSP System Scan

From recognition to scan

The pattern map helps give language to what you recognize. The HSP System Scan can then explore which system area seems most active in your specific pattern.

Use this map not as a final conclusion, but as preparation: which pattern do I recognize, which rule seems active, which update direction fits, and which support is small enough?

Conclusion

Many recurring problems become clearer when you do not start with self-judgment, but with system logic. A pattern is not automatically who you are. It is often what your system makes available under certain input, meaning, pressure, capacity and feedback.

The update direction describes what the system may need. A coaching method can support that direction. A self-help practice can be a small first step when the pattern is safe enough to explore yourself.

HSP translates recognition into system insight, so change can become smaller, safer and more precise.

Pattern ≠ cause

Important

A recognizable pattern does not yet tell you what caused it. The same visible output can arise from different predictions, rules, body states and functions. Use examples as possibilities, not as diagnosis.

Make the recurring route visible

TOOL IN CONTEXT

Use the Pattern Map when you recognize a recurring pattern and want to move from recognition to a testable system hypothesis.

In the HSP Core Protocol: MAP → FUNCTION

HSP Core Protocol Back to System Scan & tools